Labels:text | screenshot | number | font | parallel | display | document | line OCR: Standard Fuzzy Inference (input ranges int @ sect to for output rules) TIVC} T(CL) T(CF) T[WAY R(VS] FVL FIVLI PILOT E(LO) F(MO) R(SL) FIVL; F(LO) FILO) F(MO) F(H) R(ME) FIVEI FILO) R[FA) F(LO) FIMO! F(HE) FOVH RIVE FH11 F(HI FIVHY ERVHI Combs Method (Input and output renges are paired to form subrules) T[VC) T(CL) T(CF] T(WAJ T(VW) F{VLI FLOI FIMO F(HR F WH) R(VS) RISLI R(ME) RIFA R(VF) F(VL) FILO: F(MO) FIVH) IN THIS COMPARISON OF RULES generated by standard fuzzy inferencing and by the Combs Method, the economy of the Combs Method is evident. The standard method produces an exponential ri number of rules (r = number of Input ranges, i = number of inputs), a combinatorial explosion. The Combs Method produces only a linear r x i number of subrules, an easily manageable growth.
